PC Performance Review at 1440p Ultra Settings on X-Plane 11 So now that. To get the best visual graphical experience on X-Plane 11, aim to have a GPU that has at least.Ī low price point for this Silicon Power 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDRMHz was spotted on 7th Aug 2020, where we saw it at $50. X-Plane 11 makes use of DX12.00 so a GPU with that capability could benefit from enhanced visuals. We can take a look at the best price to performance. Obviously one of the most important components for this build is the graphics card.
Skymaxx pro 3.1 fps 1080p#
On at 5:32 AM, KarlL said: - How does the GPU Score (now found in the Log.txt file with Metal/Vulkan) work Choosing A Graphics Card For Our 1080p X-Plane 11 PC Build. Best GPU for X-Plane Vulkan Best GPU for X-Plane Vulkan. In X-Plane 11 players can immerse themselves in the most detailed and interactive 3D cockpits, managing every aspect.
Skymaxx pro 3.1 fps simulator#
Also, these benchmarks don’t test sustained performance, so that is another thing we want to try out when we get our hands on the first next generation flagships.X-Plane 11 is the latest uber-realistic flight simulator in the X-Plane series. By the way, these are running on a real device, you can see it move slightly between the shots of different benchmarks (as someone had to hit “go” on the various benchmarks). Another AI benchmark suggests that the Dimensity will win, however.ĭimensity 9000 benchmark results: PCMark We don’t have scores from the Snapdragon corner, so we can’t compare them. Moving on to 1440p resolution with the Aztec test, the Dimensity did 43 fps with the Vulkan backend and 42 fps with OpenGL, while the Snapdragon scored 49 fps and 43 fps, respectively.ĭimensity 9000 benchmark results: GFX Aztec Vulkan (1440p) Ī few other scores – the Dimensity 9000 got 17,573 in PCMark and 1,024 in ETHZ AI Benchmark (v5). Version 3.1 of the Manhattan test saw the Dimensity scoring 162 fps and the Snapdragon 176 fps.ĭimensity 9000 benchmark results: GFX Manhattan v3.0 Moving on to the GPU, the MediaTek chip managed 238 fps in the GFXBenc v3.0 Manhattan test, while the Snapdragon topped the Apple A15 in this test with a score of 267 fps. So, it appears that the difference in performance stems from the middle cluster. For the Snapdragon, it’s X2 at 3.0 GHz, A710 at 2.5 GHz and A510 at 1.8 GHz. The Dimensity 9000 runs its Cortex-X2 at 3.05 GHz, the three Cortex-A710 cores at 2.85 GHz and the four A510 cores at 1.8 GHz. Why is that? Well, let’s look at the CPU clock speeds per core. A Galaxy Tab S8+ also scored in the low 3,000s, though there have been higher multi-core results from the 8 Gen 1 (but still below the 4,000 mark). The Snapdragon scores from a Galaxy S22 Ultra/Note with a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 are 1,219 and 3,154. Next up comes Geekbench where the Dimensity scored 1,273 in the single-core and 4,324 in the multi-core tests.
Skymaxx pro 3.1 fps pro#
The Realme GT2 Pro also ran AnTuTu, but that was weeks ago so it may have been an older version, making the score breakdown not comparable head to head. We knew pretty early on that the chip will break the 1 million points barrier, but so did the Snapdragon. The video kicks off with AnTuTu (v9.0.7) and the MediaTek chipset posted a score of 1,017,488. The margins are pretty slim in both cases, though. Long story short, the Dimensity wins the CPU battle, but loses the GPU battle. MediaTek has gotten bold – it published a video showing a Dimensity 9000-powered device running various popular benchmarks, throwing the gauntlet at Qualcomm.
0 kommentar(er)
